It seems there are not many comments to the AA crash of November 2001, when it was ruled an accident disappeared, but an attack on the media no longer reports and history. The following years have been the safest year in airline industry history. What happens if the terrorists had to fly an Airbus instead of a simple and reliable Boeing aircraft during 9-11? Maybe they fall off the tail, and crash it had failed on the way to its destination and the attack would be. MaybeAirbus wants U.S. airlines, more of its airplanes to buy fall apart in the air and that their contribution to U.S. anti-terrorism policy will be? In my humble opinion, that Airbus which crashed was a flying chunk junk anyway.
We need better standards for new commercial aircraft, made of composite materials, because we are now more than we know in advance about this new, modern materials. We know more composites and their life cycles and airworthiness. We know more about their durabilityRelated to the strength over time, and after years of UV radiation, heat expansion and contraction, fatigue and sheer power. Go read the book Airframe by Michael Creighton. It seems that this episode in American Air Disasters story is a chapter that we do not have to watch to bear.
They are thinking it, Chicago O Hare catastrophe with the DC-10 engines did not take should not be subject to aircraft and aircraft are born with defects that should keep aircraft carriers and pylonsLaying performance engines, the wings. These pylons and engine attachments should never be so rigid as to break at the first sign of wind shear, adverse yaw at low speeds or wake turbulence. When is American Airlines, thinks that she has reviewed all of its planes and that they are ok, they fly on drugs, testing the only way is to put a lateral force on each vertical stabilizer with a similarly dominant pressure per square inch than intended by the turbulence caused by KLM747 freighter to ninety second interval with full flaps and full for a fourteen hours non-stop flight got out and require enough lift loaded to the aircraft out of the way of the NIMBY informant for airport noise abatement.
Airports make noise deal with it. If you wish to international trade, you will be more noise from aircraft using less attention, have to get it. If you ask those aircraft to do a maximum gradient, which slows the aircraft on departure thenDo not take from another plane with a fast closing speed directly behind them in a three-minute interval, which may soon be 90 seconds or less. And certainly not allow a pilot to the controls in the most sensitive time in each flight Ruck, V-2-5000 AGL. And for Pete's sake make sure the technology of yesterday against the knowledge of today. We know, composite material is not the end all for weight loss and strength. We now know more about these things than ever before. It isTime to all military aircraft also possible to verify fatigue and disruptions in flight.
It was a 747, which lost a tail a few years ago and it took 27 minutes to bring to crash, but that we have, meaning there were several planes land safely after losing a vertical fin. A real team not experienced with the two-axis autopilot for take off and actually had his hands on the controls would have had a much better chance of feeling the plane from its location in relation to theShift in weight, loss of control, the loss of two of the three hydraulic systems and be able to fly the plane with minimal use of axial differential on each engine of the airplane and straighten and hold the airspeed. No body needs, to this day.
It is high time that all Airbus aircraft with composite tails for strength by testing for the tail side to an appropriate PSI. Only then can you guarantee a situation not be repeated. The aircraft that is built, and has outlived its usefulnessused structural integrity of manufactured miss one or additional hole in an integral part of the aircraft component accidentally drilled into question should not be allowed; scrap build other tail. We have dealt with performance and strict engineering principles through the natural laws of Mother Nature who could really give a damn what you do forward. If you threaten to deny or to those of known amounts, visit Murphy visit more frequently than originally expected. Shameto Airbus, AMR shame, shame on the pilots, shame on us, we are so stupid to believe that the characteristics are not those of the flight, AMR or manage construction of the aircraft at Airbus? Can they arbitrarily decide on the money and profits over the truth of the flight characteristics that apply to a maximum time speed and distance also allow the natural laws with respect to the truth and knowledge in the whole world know, like gravity, weight, thrust and lift? In these threedimensional plane with the name of the Earth, we have opportunities, they do not change, why do we accept? This crash was not as if the original Comet, which due to circumstances not yet known, has died, such as harmonics, none of the crash was caused by the negligence of AMR management and share short-term rate of return on the safety and consumer expectations. Some industry analysts say that Airbus are construction workers for the laziest Union in the world to sell, especially at the government-subsidized airlines.
The aircraftinvolved in this crash was an old Eastern Airlines plane that was probably not too stable anyway back to the lack of maintenance, if the airline was falling apart. Three pilots are sitting in a cockpit, which make far more than the average living standard and negates the reason they are paid so highly. She would not have near the KLM, as the commander should have moved from the problem, and if the problems do not occur should the first airplane flew.
CompositePreventive maintenance has been debated for years, and an article I entitled to help save from May 1999 in Aviation Maintenance, Sharing Solutions to Composite Repair Questions understand some people, that this accident was avoidable. Also in the article was a reference to CACRCs leaders;
ISBN # 0-7680-0020-3, Order # AE-27.
After the crash, they all O'Hare DC-10 pilots through the same scenario, survived half of it in the simulator, so that American Airlines flight and crashwas entirely avoidable. How often do we have to allow an airline with a wealth of political influence to get that stuff? How quickly we forget. Think about it.
0 comments:
Post a Comment